my new toy..

Foot injured..

At night.. I went to see a doctor with my classmate.. she injured her wrist due to overuse her hands I think.. practicing from day to night non-stop is too taxing.. she ngong de..



went to see this doctor sumwhere in SS2, recommended by my lecturer.. People willing to wait a couple of hours just to seek 10 minutes treatment from him..

yea.. me too, I waited from.. 6pm to 9++pm, around 3 hours.. some even worst, they waited up to 5 hours .. @@ ..

I actually injured my ankle few months ago, just that, it takes forever to recover.. Did consult on the doctor, undergo those soundwave diagnose thingy, said that my nerves got swollen and it would eventually recover by itself.. and he gave me some pills and an injection to cure it, it did make things better, but not completely =S So I just leave it there minimize by ankle movements, hopefully it recover some day..

so decided to give it a try for this, see how it goes..

maybe he's that good.. and he charges around rm40.. quite reasonable I guess..


In the end, we came out with her hand wraped up..

and mine on the foot..

that's pathetic.. sigh..

Concentration Is the Key by Tamim Ansary

These days, many people take pride in the ability to multitask, but me? I'd just like to master mono-tasking.

I realize that everything I've done well in my life I've done in a state of intense concentration -- a state of such focus on one task that no other information or concern can break in. My only question has been, and remains, how to get into that zone.

R.N. Whitehead, director of a Canadian tutoring program called Oxford Learning Centres, speculates that concentration is an ability like any other. People are born with a propensity for it but the skill must then be developed, and the process begins in childhood.

Until recent decades, Whitehead says, people learned to read from books that had relatively few pictures and were written in "natural language," which presented readers with lots of vocabulary they didn't necessarily know. Reading those books demanded -- but also built -- concentration.

Today, books for beginning readers tend to have lots of pictures and only a few words, and those words are carefully selected to be reading-level appropriate so that children rarely encounter words they must puzzle out from context. If the material is well sequenced, children emerge into reading naturally without palpable effort, almost without noticing: That's the theory.
The theory works. Kids do learn to read from carefully calibrated materials such as these, but building up the power of concentration? That's a different issue.

Many elements of modern life may actually erode concentration by involving children in short bursts of interaction that return quick rewards. Take video games, for example. What they have to give, you can get in five seconds -- bang! pow! hey, that felt good! -- and if you play for 10 seconds, you get the same thing twice (and for 30 seconds, six times).

Playing a video game for hours on end (not uncommon -- been there/done that) resembles concentration but is actually, in my opinion, the exact opposite; it is to concentration as antimatter is to matter.

By contrast, reading or telling stories to very young children may help build concentration by involving them in a narrative that takes shape over time and offers a payoff only if they've stayed with the story throughout.

Concentration -- why bother?
Concentration is worth building because it is a foundational skill; it supports almost everything else one might do. In that way it's like intelligence. In fact, definitions of intelligence often include concentration as a component. Anecdotes about famous achievers of history suggest that one thing they shared was a phenomenal ability to get fully immersed in … something.

Michelangelo spent two years on his back, two feet from the ceiling, painting the Sistine Chapel. I myself would have spent most of that time idly wondering whether to have pizza that night or soup.

In fact, according to the stories, only the pope could break the great artist's concentration. He kept coming in to ask, "How's it going?" Finally Michelangelo "accidentally" dropped a hammer that landed too close for comfort, and the pope stayed away after that.

Most of the advice aimed at students about how to concentrate amounts to Michelangelo's hammer: eliminate distractions, they say. For example, turn off the TV (duh), turn off the stereo (duh) and power down the iPod (you think?). It's all true, but it's purely external advice. It addresses the place where you concentrate, not the "you" who concentrates.

Advice about the inner you mostly boils down to health tips masquerading as concentration tips:

• You can't concentrate when you're drowsy, so get enough sleep.
• You can't concentrate when you're groggy, so don't sleep too much.
• You can't concentrate when you're starving, so eat right.
• You can't concentrate when you're bloated, so don't overeat.
• And get some exercise, for heaven's sake! You can't concentrate if --

I'll stop there. It's worthy advice, but generic. The same tips apply to almost anything you might want to do better. Want to ace a test? Memorize the "Iliad"? Learn juggling tricks? Eat right, exercise well, get enough sleep. Yes, Mom.

There's got to be more. People with phenomenal powers of concentration reveal it most dramatically when the context doesn't favor them. I'm thinking of a chef I knew years ago when I worked in a gourmet restaurant as a waiter. The dining room at that place was always whisper quiet, the kitchen always a madhouse. One night, I stepped into that chaos -- the ice machine had broken, a fight had erupted between two sous-chefs, someone was waving a knife -- and there was June, calmly stirring a sauce. Suddenly a pot of something caught fire. Pandemonium ensued; everybody rushed to douse the flames, but June never took her eyes off her sauce -- it wasn't her pot on fire. Later I asked if she had noticed the fire. She had. How then could she just ignore it? "I was making hollandaise," she said. "You have to watch it or it breaks."

That, my friends, is concentration on the hoof: It's not the ability to focus in the absence of distraction, but the ability to focus in spite of distraction.

Attention surplus condition
Our society has put little effort into devising techniques for building attentiveness. We get interested in concentration mostly when its absence rises to the level of a clinical syndrome. A whole industry has developed, for example, around the disability known as attention deficit disorder, or ADD.

I don't doubt that ADD exists, nor that it merits clinical consideration, nor that suitable treatments may help restore people who suffer from this disability to a normal state. I only wonder if "normal" is as good as it gets. How about moving from normal to extraordinary?

According to psychologist Richard Davidson, "Attention can be trained, and in a way that is not fundamentally different [from] how physical exercise changes the body." He zeroes in specifically on meditation, that body of techniques perfected in East Asia for achieving attentive calm. Research by Davidson and his associates at the University of Wisconsin seems to prove that meditation can, in fact, improve one's ability to shut out distraction.

The proof
In one experiment, people were taught certain basic meditation techniques and then asked to meditate while hooked up to machines that scanned what their brains were doing. In people who attained a deep, meditative state, it turned out, the area of the brain known to be associated with attention became active while other areas -- those associated with emotion, for example, or with processing external stimuli -- went dormant.

Researchers then hooked brain-scanning equipment to two groups of test subjects: seasoned meditators with thousands of hours of experience and novices. With each group, when the meditators seemed to be fully immersed, the researchers set off various distractions nearby -- a blaring TV, a crying baby, a gunshot, stuff like that.

In the novices, each event triggered brain waves that spread to other parts of their brains and did not die away for a long time. In the experienced meditators, each event set off a brief burst of brain activity in one limited area and then the brain went back to its former state: In short, the input was noticed, registered and set aside.

That looks like dead-bang proof that meditation enhances a person's underlying ability to concentrate. Of course it's also true that meditation classically aims to detach meditators from the world and get them concentrating essentially on nothing. I, personally, would rather concentrate on something. I don't want to detach from the world, I want to stay in it and get something done. I don't know of any definitive proof that the power of concentration developed by meditation can be applied, for example, to flying a plane through a thunderstorm.

But the broader point seems indisputable: Concentration is a skill. If it isn't used, it can atrophy; if it isn't trained, it fails to develop past a certain point. But by the same token, with the proper training and practice, it can be developed to a level of fearsome intensity.

Preferably, this begins in childhood (which is where parents and other elders come in) but it's never too late. Adults with normal powers of concentration can strengthen those powers with simple exercises such as the following:

• Count backward from 100 slowly and steadily.
• Count backward from 100 by threes.
• Simply look at an object for a set period -- say, 15 minutes.
• Building on the previous exercise, remove the object and picture it for that same period.

And if the buzz of distracting thoughts grows intolerable, stop what you're doing, make a list of everything on your mind at that moment, choose one thing to focus on, and then schedule a time to deal with all the rest. Giving your anxieties appointments, I find, tends to make them stop petitioning for attention now.

In short, I stand with those Zen masters who, when asked how they achieved enlightenment, answered, "When I walk, I just walk. When I eat, I just eat."

extracted from,

http://encarta.msn.com/encnet/Features/Columns/?article=ConcentrationIsKey&gt1=27004

body checkup

juz came back from checkup @ Kajang BP centre.. quite crowded in the morning, and there aren't enough chairs for the patient.. I stood there for nearly 2 hours until my turn..

the staff there are nice and kind as they keep on busy working but never neglect the patient around and try their best to answer enquiries.. the staff @ the counter even pull out her own seat and give it to an old man standing nearby, compare to some 2 talkative aunties who sitted there whole day long and chit chatting..

since I've been standing there for 2 hours, I've got nothing to do other than observing those staff walking around and doing their jobs.. I saw a lady which I think she's in her 20s, she's not only young and good looking she's also kind and nice as well, although she never stop working for the whole morning she still appear to be very patience, speaking in a soft and well manered tone to the people around.. Then she notice me standing there for like almost 2 hours (it's almost my turn) she also showed some concern like asking me wether had I done registration or not.. I simply answered her and she continue to busy in her own stuff..

then its my turn, apparently she's the person to do check up for me.. quite co-incidence also, cuz I saw her first busy with checkup stuff, then turned to busy some documentation stuff afterwards for quite a long time, and one guy took over her job.. I tot I would be meeting the guy, instead, she return to her post and I was the next person to do the checkup.. she speaks to me soft and nicely, wow, haha, I also kinda emberassed answering her.. I tot I would only see that in dramas, and never ever in MALAYSIA, and a small centre sum more..

the process taking my blood sample wasn't that smooth, she states that I'm too nervous (in fact, maybe I do..) keep on asking me to relax relax .. the more she asked me to, the more nervous I am.. in the end, I took 3 shots in total..

and then proceed to ECG checkup, I've got no idea what is that, since I got it in the "package" thingy, I'll just do it as well.. again she's the same person doing the test for me.. she brought me into a room.. then ask me to took off my shirt.. stunted about few seconds, I stare at her showing some sort of retarded looking face, she stare back at me again asking me took out the shirt again, uhh.. then only I took out my shirt and noticed her laughing behind me..

the rest is just normal checkup.. that's all, took me the whole morning just to do simple checkup..
best thing is, I get to meet such nice and kind person, lucky me..

Polycarb water bottles harmful to health

look for this sign underneath your plastic bottle

GEORGE TOWN: Polycarbonate water bottles are harmful and the use of them may be linked to many health abnormalities, says the Consumer Association of Penang.

Its president S.M. Mohamed Idris said that polycarbonate-made water bottles will leach out bisphenol A (BPA), a potent hormone disruptor which can have a detrimental effect on future generations.

“BPA is a synthetic chemical that is also known as ‘environmental hormones.’ It can disrupt the hormone-secreting glands that form a network known as the endocrine system that includes the thyroid, pituitary, pancreas, thymus, adrenal, ovaries and testical glands.

“The chemical could lead to impairment of the reproductive organs, has an adverse effect on tumours and on prostate development by reducing sperm count, and also has adverse influence on breast cancer tissue development,” he said during a press conference on Tuesday.

He said that such bottles can be identified by a number seven inside a triangle with the letters PC next to it.

“The bottles are being sold everywhere and people think they are safe as they can withstand high temperature liquids.

“But researchers have found out that BPA can leach into the bottle’s contents through normal wear and tear, exposure to heat and cleaning agents,” he said.

Mohamed Idris claimed that a study conducted by the University of Missouri found that the chemical can even leach into liquids at room temperature.

“This finding is alarming and I urge the Education Ministry and parents to ban the use of the bottles in schools and for the people to restrain from using polycarbonate or any other plastic bottles,” he said.

He said that steel or glass bottles are preferred and cost about the same as the polycarbonate bottle at around RM12.

Extracted from The Star